Strategy, efficiency, review process, domain, open access...
If you can't find the answer to your question, or have an idea for a topic, tool,...
A discussion with Prof. Bernardo Innocenti where ask the following question. What are the most common reason of revision? What do reviewers look a first? How to deal with conflicting views between reviews? How to make the best out of the review process? What are the key elements to a good response? What to do with off-topic or irrelevant comments? How are reviewers selected? What is the role of the editor in the review process? What are open reviews? Are these types of practices the future of reviews?
Prof Bernardo Innoncenti
Prof Berke shares his writing method in a comprehensive and detailed manner. His presentation focuses on the more detailed aspects of paper writing with the goal of avoiding major revisions. We will do this through actual personal examples of minor and major revised papers, and provide detailed explanations about their correction and lesson learned
Prof Peter Berke
We ask a series of question Work organization and strategies: what is your process? How to avoid major revision? Dos and don’t during the writing process. What are the key aspects of each section of the paper? How to better communicate in a paper? General advice for PhDs
Prof Marc Geers
This webinar is intended for all H2020-funded researchers (ERC, Marie Curie individual fellowship, collaborative projects, COFUND…). It addresses issues related to providing Open Access to your publications in order to comply with the Open Access regulations of the Horizon 2020 programme. You will learn how to comply with H2020 Open Access terms as well as with the Open Access Decree of the Wallonia-Brussels Federation to which you are also subject.
« Un data paper (ou data article) est une publication scientifique dont le but principal est de décrire un ou plusieurs jeux de données, plutôt que des résultats d'analyse. Ils sont parfois regroupés dans les data journals, sont citables au même titre que les publications classiques, et permettent d’augmenter la visibilité des données de la recherche. »
Dr Taïs Grippa, Dr Sarah Zahreddine
Il s’agit de la seconde table ronde autour des grandes stratégies de rédaction de thèse: écrire une thèse par articles. Nous verrons ensemble leurs différences et conséquences sur la rédaction; depuis la préparation à la révision, par vous-même et/ou les membres de votre comité. Pour ce faire, nous invitons des professeur·e·s et responsables de laboratoires de recherche à l'ULB qui répondront à vos questions.
Prof Thierry J. Massart, Dr Karim Ehab Moustafa Kamel
Cette table ronde traite d’une des deux grandes stratégies de rédaction de thèse: en manuscrit (en opposition à “par articles”). Quels sont les avantages qui incitent à choisir cette stragéie? Comment se déroulent-elles concrètement?
Prof Cécile Vanderpelen-Diagre, Dr Juliette Masquelier
a practical guide to becoming better PhDs
Copyright © 2023 PeerWriting. All rights reserved.