Specifically for PhD candidates: AI-powered search, code-free statistics exploration, literature management,...
If you can't find the answer to your question, or have an idea for a topic, tool,...
Perhaps you use a proofreading service to prepare your articles for publication? The TEA Project can to improve your academic English by working with you to correct some or all of an academic article. We are offering a limited number of âcollaborative correctionâ sessions, to a total of around 5 hours. We will work in tandem with you to proofread your article.
Remnote is a freely accessible tool developed for non-linear note-taking and spaced repetition learning. What is non-linear note-taking? It is the very useful ability to connect concepts and topics across any note that you take (literature review, course, etc.), providing a structure to accumulated knowledge based on the ideas and concepts themselves rather than the sequences in which the notes were taken or the structure of the base material. Remnote also proposes a built-in tool for "spaced repetition learning" which helps you beat the infamous forgetting curve.
PeerWriting Team
Comment traiter la question de sa subjectivité dans des recherches qualitatives (non-quantitative)? Quelles sont les bonnes pratiques en entretien? Quelle sont les différences et rapprochement avec les études quantitatives?
Dr Dorothée Baillet
A discussion with Prof. Bernardo Innocenti where ask the following question. What are the most common reason of revision? What do reviewers look a first? How to deal with conflicting views between reviews? How to make the best out of the review process? What are the key elements to a good response? What to do with off-topic or irrelevant comments? How are reviewers selected? What is the role of the editor in the review process? What are open reviews? Are these types of practices the future of reviews?
Prof Bernardo Innoncenti
Prof Berke shares his writing method in a comprehensive and detailed manner. His presentation focuses on the more detailed aspects of paper writing with the goal of avoiding major revisions. We will do this through actual personal examples of minor and major revised papers, and provide detailed explanations about their correction and lesson learned
Prof Peter Berke
We ask a series of question Work organization and strategies: what is your process? How to avoid major revision? Dos and donât during the writing process. What are the key aspects of each section of the paper? How to better communicate in a paper? General advice for PhDs
Prof Marc Geers
« Un data paper (ou data article) est une publication scientifique dont le but principal est de dĂ©crire un ou plusieurs jeux de donnĂ©es, plutĂŽt que des rĂ©sultats d'analyse. Ils sont parfois regroupĂ©s dans les data journals, sont citables au mĂȘme titre que les publications classiques, et permettent dâaugmenter la visibilitĂ© des donnĂ©es de la recherche. »
Dr TaĂŻs Grippa, Dr Sarah Zahreddine
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Consensus or other AI assistants are reshaping academic research, offering exciting possibilities but also raising critical questions. In this table ronde, weâll explore how these tools work, their strengths and limitations, and how to use them effectively for tasks like literature searches, idea generation, critical review or content refinement. Weâll also address ethical concerns, ULBâs guidelines for responsible use, and strategies for maintaining research integrity. A call will also be made for a working group to further address these questions, bringing together PhD students and researchers from various disciplines.
Il sâagit de la seconde table ronde autour des grandes stratĂ©gies de rĂ©daction de thĂšse: écrire une thĂšse par articles. Nous verrons ensemble leurs diffĂ©rences et consĂ©quences sur la rĂ©daction; depuis la prĂ©paration Ă la rĂ©vision, par vous-mĂȘme et/ou les membres de votre comitĂ©. Pour ce faire, nous invitons des  professeur·e·s et responsables de laboratoires de recherche Ă l'ULB qui rĂ©pondront Ă vos questions.
Prof Thierry J. Massart, Dr Karim Ehab Moustafa Kamel
Cette table ronde traite dâune des deux grandes stratĂ©gies de rĂ©daction de thĂšse: en manuscrit (en opposition Ă âpar articlesâ).  Quels sont les avantages qui incitent Ă choisir cette stragĂ©ie? Comment se dĂ©roulent-elles concrĂštement?Â
Prof Cécile Vanderpelen-Diagre, Dr Juliette Masquelier
a practical guide to becoming better PhDs
Copyright © 2023 PeerWriting. All rights reserved.