About the writing process

Specifically for PhD candidates: AI-powered search, code-free statistics exploration, literature management,...


ask your question here ➔

If you can't find the answer to your question, or have an idea for a topic, tool,...

background

Publier un article. Augmenter son Impact

background

Auteur en sciences de la santé

background

Publier en Sciences humaines et sociales (cycle de formation)

Mme Françoise Vandooren

background

Collaborative correction of your scientific articles in English

Perhaps you use a proofreading service to prepare your articles for publication? The TEA Project can to improve your academic English by working with you to correct some or all of an academic article. We are offering a limited number of ‘collaborative correction’ sessions, to a total of around 5 hours. We will work in tandem with you to proofread your article.

background

Non linear note taking

Remnote is a freely accessible tool developed for non-linear note-taking and spaced repetition learning. What is non-linear note-taking? It is the very useful ability to connect concepts and topics across any note that you take (literature review, course, etc.), providing a structure to accumulated knowledge based on the ideas and concepts themselves rather than the sequences in which the notes were taken or the structure of the base material. Remnote also proposes a built-in tool for "spaced repetition learning" which helps you beat the infamous forgetting curve.

PeerWriting Team

background

How to increase your writing efficiency

During this seminar, Dr Emmanuelle Honoré (at the time at Archeological dept. - Cambridge Univerisity) share his personal experience about monitoring literature.

Dr Emmanuelle Honoré

background

Publier des recherches qualitative (non-quantitatives)

Comment traiter la question de sa subjectivité dans des recherches qualitatives (non-quantitative)? Quelles sont les bonnes pratiques en entretien? Quelle sont les différences et rapprochement avec les études quantitatives?

Dr Dorothée Baillet

background

Good Practices for authors during the Review Process

A discussion with Prof. Bernardo Innocenti where ask the following question. What are the most common reason of revision? What do reviewers look a first? How to deal with conflicting views between reviews? How to make the best out of the review process? What are the key elements to a good response? What to do with off-topic or irrelevant comments? How are reviewers selected? What is the role of the editor in the review process? What are open reviews? Are these types of practices the future of reviews?

Prof Bernardo Innoncenti

background

Step by step method to write a paper

Prof Berke shares his writing method in a comprehensive and detailed manner. His presentation focuses on the more detailed aspects of paper writing with the goal of avoiding major revisions. We will do this through actual personal examples of minor and major revised papers, and provide detailed explanations about their correction and lesson learned

Prof Peter Berke

background

Key Principles to writing a Scientific Paper

We ask a series of question Work organization and strategies: what is your process? How to avoid major revision? Dos and don’t during the writing process. What are the key aspects of each section of the paper? How to better communicate in a paper? General advice for PhDs

Prof Marc Geers

background

What are preprints and how to make use of them?

A discussion about the use of preprint for researchers with Prof Olivier Klein

Prof Olivier Klein

background

Publier un article scientifique en architecture

background

Les DataPapers : une voie supplémentaire de publication

« Un data paper (ou data article) est une publication scientifique dont le but principal est de décrire un ou plusieurs jeux de données, plutôt que des résultats d'analyse. Ils sont parfois regroupés dans les data journals, sont citables au même titre que les publications classiques, et permettent d’augmenter la visibilité des données de la recherche. »

Dr Taïs Grippa, Dr Sarah Zahreddine

background

Upcoming!

Tools, uses and misuses of AI in academic research at ULB 

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Consensus or other AI assistants are reshaping academic research, offering exciting possibilities but also raising critical questions. In this table ronde, we’ll explore how these tools work, their strengths and limitations, and how to use them effectively for tasks like literature searches, idea generation, critical review or content refinement. We’ll also address ethical concerns, ULB’s guidelines for responsible use, and strategies for maintaining research integrity. A call will also be made for a working group to further address these questions, bringing together PhD students and researchers from various disciplines.

background

Écrire une thèse “par articles”

Il s’agit de la seconde table ronde autour des grandes stratégies de rédaction de thèse: écrire une thèse par articles.  Nous verrons ensemble leurs différences et conséquences sur la rédaction; depuis la préparation à la révision, par vous-même et/ou les membres de votre comité. Pour ce faire, nous invitons des  professeur·e·s et responsables de laboratoires de recherche à l'ULB qui répondront à vos questions.

Prof Thierry J. Massart, Dr Karim Ehab Moustafa Kamel

background

Écrire une thèse sous forme de manuscrit

Cette table ronde traite d’une des deux grandes stratégies de rédaction de thèse: en manuscrit (en opposition à “par articles”).   Quels sont les avantages qui incitent à choisir cette stragéie? Comment se déroulent-elles concrètement? 

Prof Cécile Vanderpelen-Diagre, Dr Juliette Masquelier

Legal

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

PhD & Post Doc Society

a practical guide to becoming better PhDs

Copyright © 2023 PeerWriting. All rights reserved.